Login:
Password:

MPAA Sues YouTVpc, Peekvid for Copyright Infringement

By Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews

June 27, 2007, 6:39 PM

Two more distributors of allegedly -- if not obviously -- unlicensed content are facing civil prosecution by the Motion Picture Association of America this afternoon. YouTVpc and Peekvid are the subjects of civil suits in US District Court in Los Angeles, not only for hosting unlicensed content but linking to other sources for unlicensed content as well.

It's that second part of the claim which could be the most telling of the MPAA's current strategy: We had never seen these two sites for ourselves before today. In pulling up YouTVpc for the first time, we found links to movies and TV shows, some of which were actually being hosted on YouTube. Some of those links - including, most notably, the one marked "Spiderman 3" - were inoperative today, perhaps on account of this lawsuit.

As the MPAA's anti-piracy chief, John Malcolm, said today in a prepared statement, if you sense the Association is sending a revised signal, you're right. It's going after sites which link to the hosts of pirated material, and these two are just today's examples.

"The sole purpose of these sites is to disseminate content that has been illegally reproduced and distributed," Malcolm said. "They are a one-stop shop for copyright infringement. These lawsuits should serve as a warning to other aspiring movie theft 'entrepreneurs' that they are not above the law and will face serious consequences for their activities."

Up front, YouTVpc provides links to a limited number of features, which are shown in streams (like YouTube) though not downloads. On its surface, this might not seem like illegal distribution as Malcolm alleged, though it could be interpreted as illegal reproduction. However, YouTVpc did contain a link marked "Movie Downloads," which led us to a second site with an altogether different title. This site promises downloads of movies and TV shows, not streams, if only you'll take the time to register...and to pay a fee, and to install some software.

The FAQ for this second site features the question, "What movies do you have?" It answers itself with the following: "The network has almost every movie in the world. Stay connected with our millions of satisfied users and find any movie you're looking for!"

Today's MPAA statement goes on to allege that both sites "rely on advertisers to maintain their illegal websites and they profit handsomely from a seemingly endless stream of third-party advertising pitches."

We didn't see that in our tests, though perhaps the reason was because we declined to install any number of controls or cookies, especially those sent to us by Peekvid. Though the MPAA claims Peekvid and YouTVpc operate servers located in the US, we found that many of the (non-YouTube) streams and the sources of the cookies and controls we blocked were located elsewhere, including Mexico.

The existence of these sites may have only caught the attention of the MPAA just last April, as a result of a Wall Street Journal investigation into so-called "guerilla" movie sites, in which Malcolm was called upon for comment. In that article, the proprietors of YouTVpc bragged about their methodology.

While the WSJ reporter compared them to guerilla warriors, they compared themselves to weeds. Said one YouTVpc proprietor, "If one host gets shut down, there are three others that are going to pop up."

Add a Comment (10 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By sr386

edited Jul 12, 2007 - 2:04 AM

Man what a joke! Don't know what the deal is with this YouTVpc site is all about but Peekvid
doesn't install any software at all that I have seen. Not to mention it only provides links to sites like YouTube who HOST the content so where does the MPAA get off attacking some site just listing links ??? Why not hit at the heart of the matter and go after the sites that allow uploads of this "illegal" content rather than some little linking site who's only profit is from advertising not through sales or subscriptions even to their site?
If the content was UPLOADED and STORED on YouTube and other same type sites isn't that where the attack should be directed? Sounds to me like they have a big problem but are scared to go after the real criminals, the people who UPLOAD and or STORE that content on their servers! It's like they want to kill the birds
because they didn't eat enough bugs to keep their garden pest free if you ask me...
Just a little more than slightly moronic in my opinion. I have links to other sites on the net
and I'd be pretty upset if one of those sites wasn't right, but to hold me liable for something they have would really tick me off and I'd be suing for anything and everything I could get even if it was a loosing battle on my end just to make this point, "You don't kill the messenger for bringing you bad news"!
Find the actual source and rip out the heart of the problem and leave the people just trying to make a living alone! If linking is a crime then we're all in big trouble out here on the net.
I can't ever remember being on any site that doesn't have outside and 3rd party links to go to and I can't hold those sites liable for the content on the links sites outside theirs, how would that be possible? I have been to a lot of sites that tried to stick me with viruses, trojans, worms, bad scripts, oh heck an endless list of problems out here attacking me but I never held a site responsible unless they purposely sent me to that bad link like PCH did once to a site that tried to breach my browser security, I complained and they ditched that advertising company almost immediately!
Maybe the MPAA should rethink what it's doing before making it's self look pretty damn stupid!

Peace Out!
SR386

Score: 0

By Chris-TV

edited Jul 3, 2007 - 9:18 AM

Judging on what has happened in the past it does not look good for PeekVid unless the Australian owners pack their bags and move to Panama:

* Daily Episodes vs. Fox – Daily episodes was shut down after it was suggested it received take down notices from Fox.
* AllSimps.com vs. Fox – AllSimps.com removed its entire directory of infringing links in fear of retribution from Fox.
* TVLinks vs. MPAA – TVLinks relocated after it was threatened by the MPAA
* QuickSilverScreen vs. Fox – QuickSilverScreen was given away by an American Citizen to a Malaysian citizen to escape U.S. copyright law
* MahTV vs. MPAA – MahTV, a UK based website, was shutdown after cease and desist letters from the MPAA.

Source: http://www.webtvwire.com...-lawsuit-future-is-grim/

Score: 0

By psych0fred

posted Jun 28, 2007 - 9:45 PM

So by their logic shouldn't they sue this news outlet for promoting the site?

If they go after real pirates, that's justified. But going after people who just point to others violates the ideals of individual freedom. I'll be more than happy to go out of my way to make sure the studios (Fox, Paramount) named get none of my money.

Score: 0

By Mystiqq

edited Jun 28, 2007 - 1:37 PM

"This site promises downloads of movies and TV shows, not streams, if only you'll take the time to register...and to pay a fee, and to install some software."

Dubious at best.

Score: 0

By Tenoq

posted Jun 27, 2007 - 8:21 PM

"It's going after sites which link to the hosts of pirated material..."

So why not try it on with Google, rather than just going after those who can't defend themselves, MPAA? I can easily find an illegal torrent with Google search; or any other search engine for that matter. :P

The strategies employed by the MPAA & RIAA are sickening, if not illegal. Extortion is still a crime, isn't it?

Score: 0

By Couscous

posted Jun 28, 2007 - 4:08 AM

That's what I was thinking.

What's next? Sue Microsoft and Apple for making OS's that let you get online?

Then sue the PC manufacturers. Then the company they hired to print the discs.

Score: 0

By dlab21

edited Jun 27, 2007 - 8:55 PM

you didn't get the memo? rights to a trial of one's peers have also been suspended, the RIAA makes the laws now.

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Jun 28, 2007 - 9:17 AM

You're either woefully uninformed, or a troll.

I'll be kind and assume the former.

Copyright cases are tried in civil court, not criminal court. In civil court, there are no jurors. The case is heard by a judge only and decided by that judge. No criminal record can result from a civil case.

Score: 0

By veeoh

edited Jun 28, 2007 - 9:56 AM

knowitall

Score: 0

By PC_Tool

posted Jun 28, 2007 - 12:18 PM

It just seems like it. I don't actually know *everything*.

That's what Google is for.

Score: 0