Jane Macartney, of The Times, in Beijing
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
A former Chinese university professor who was dismissed after he founded a democratic opposition party, plans to sue Yahoo! and Google in the United States for blocking his name from search results in China.
Guo Quan, an expert on classical Chinese literature and the 1937 Nanjing massacre of Chinese civilians by Japanese troops, last week issued an open letter pledging to bring a lawsuit against Google after he discovered that his name had been excised in searches of its google.cn portal in China.
He told The Times that he had now found that the Chinese Yahoo! site had also blocked his name and he planned to bring actions against both companies. Mr Guo said: “Since January 1 a lot of friends told me that websites with my name had been closed. They told me it's impossible to search for my information on Google and Yahoo!”
It is not the first incidence of censorship of foreign internet portals operating in China. Google came in for widespread criticism and accusations of colluding when it became known that its search engine in China had been configured to filter out words that are effectively banned in China, such as Tibet independence, Dalai Lama and democracy.
Google and other foreign internet service providers defend their actions, saying that they are acting in accordance with Chinese law and the conditions of doing business in China. The country's carefully patrolled internet firewall slows, blocks or disrupts users trying to access uncensored foreign websites. Mr Guo said that he could not sue Google or Yahoo! in China since they have no formal legal identity, but he would press his lawsuits against the parent companies in the United States. “They have infringed my right to my name, and also the rights of anyone called Guo Quan because you can find no information for this name.
“They have violated my political rights. I am opposed to violence and dictatorship but these sites have blocked me.”
Last year Mr Guo threw down a gauntlet to the ruling Communist Party by declaring that he was acting as the chairman of the underground New People's Party and claimed 10 million members at home and abroad. He posted open letters to President Hu Jintao demanding multi-party elections and the depoliticisation of the People's Liberation Army. His blog was closed by the Chinese cyber-police.
His employer has demoted him to work in the university archives for violating the Chinese Constitution, which stipulates that China must be ruled “under the leadership of the Communist Party”.
Mr Guo did not mince words in his open letter. “To make money, Google has become a servile Pekinese dog wagging its tail at the heels of the Chinese communists,” he wrote.
He could understand why search the engine Baidu.com, a Chinese company and the locally controlled arm of portal Yahoo!, could have been coerced by the Government to block his name, he said, but it was unacceptable for foreign companies to follow suit. He said that he had noticed in the past few days that he could find 700 results in a search on his name, but that there should be tens of thousands of results if the two characters for his name were unblocked.
He told The Times that he would persist with his lawsuit. “Through this I hope that the world will become more concerned to resolve human rights issues in China. The freedom of the internet should be realised all over the world.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
i agree, google should take a moral higher ground and not agree to censor itself for China.
I say that not owning any google stock, of course...
gabriel, boulder, co
I think it's absolutely ridiculous that Google and Yahoo would kowtow to the dictates of a Communist regime. I think that these companies would be the ones who would have similarly salivated at the chance to make money in the 1930s-40s by working with the Nazis.
In addition to Guo's excellent quote: "Google has become a servile Pekinese dog..." is probably what most people around the world are taking Google and Yahoo for these days.
Stephen S, New York, NY, USA
zhu zhongyu, the question is not whether or not China should have a multi-party election or not. IMHO, the US (where I live) should stop having 'multi-party' elections and do as much as possible to remove the idea of political parties from the political process. So the objection is not to the idea of having single party elections, the objection is to the obstruction of any ability to even talk about multi-party elections.
Any form of democracy anywhere requires that the people involved be able to discuss ideas openly and freely so as to be able to make informed decisions. Censorship of any kind significantly hampers this. Any government that practices censorship on a wide scale is not a democracy, western style or otherwise.
Eric Hopper, SEATTLE, WA
The issue isn't, as suggested below, what form the democracy in China takes, but what international companies such as Google are doing supporting, at least tacitly, such oppressive governmental policies as the sequestration of information to the average citizen.
We are reaching, in the West at least, an age of democratisation of information; whether all choose to use it wisely or otherwise, or not all, is their privilege - they should at least be given the choice, rather than have their government tell them that certain matters, such as civil rights for an oppressed nation, are not even a matter for consideration or appraisal, much less debate.
Ultimately, China is a sovereign state, and disagreeable as some policies may seem to foreigners, we have no say in them. But nor ought we to lend tacit support, as Google has done in agreeing to censorship.
Ted, Bristol, UK
Google and Yahoo should not do business in these countries if the foreign power lays down censorship rules. Get out.
Alan, Chelmsford, UK
china need not multi-party election right now,china can explore a new form of democracy, which is different from western style.
zhu zhongyu, liaoyang,